<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom In-Depth: Smart Collections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dremer.org</link>
	<description>photography, post-processing, myself and anything in between...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leota Uppinghouse</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-3970</link>
		<dc:creator>Leota Uppinghouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-3970</guid>
		<description>I just found this blog a while ago when a buddy recommended it to me.  I have been an avid reader ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found this blog a while ago when a buddy recommended it to me.  I have been an avid reader ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Dremer</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-3634</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Dremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-3634</guid>
		<description>Carl-Erik,

I think can be achieved by defining a smart collection in which one of the filters is &quot;collection&quot; and it refers to another smart collection. this way you will have nested smart collections.
The only thing that will not be optimal here is the fact that visually the collections tree will not be nested.

I think it should work but I havent tested it.

Nir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl-Erik,</p>
<p>I think can be achieved by defining a smart collection in which one of the filters is &#8220;collection&#8221; and it refers to another smart collection. this way you will have nested smart collections.<br />
The only thing that will not be optimal here is the fact that visually the collections tree will not be nested.</p>
<p>I think it should work but I havent tested it.</p>
<p>Nir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl-Erik</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl-Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Great tip! Exactly what I was looking for. 

Wish there was a way of specifying filters on the collection sets as well. Then you could have smart collections in the hierarchy under that further filtering the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip! Exactly what I was looking for. </p>
<p>Wish there was a way of specifying filters on the collection sets as well. Then you could have smart collections in the hierarchy under that further filtering the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: top rated digital cameras</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>top rated digital cameras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Finally, got what I was looking for!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. Glad I stumbled into this article! smile I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, got what I was looking for!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. Glad I stumbled into this article! smile I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Dremer</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Dremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

it seems like you&#039;re right, I quiet sure there was a reason for this solution (it was the agreed solution for the problem in Lightroom Forums)... it might be that it didnt exist in earlier version... though i&#039;m not sure.

bottom line, you&#039;re right. will update tutorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>it seems like you&#8217;re right, I quiet sure there was a reason for this solution (it was the agreed solution for the problem in Lightroom Forums)&#8230; it might be that it didnt exist in earlier version&#8230; though i&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>bottom line, you&#8217;re right. will update tutorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Webb</title>
		<link>http://dremer.org/articles/lightroom-in-depth-smart-collections/comment-page-1/#comment-2623</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dremer.org/?page_id=824#comment-2623</guid>
		<description>Actually, you can set a Smart Collection to Keywords&gt;Are Empty. Don&#039;t need the whole aphabet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you can set a Smart Collection to Keywords&gt;Are Empty. Don&#8217;t need the whole aphabet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
